Radio & T.V.

New York Times Best Seller!

Product Details
Hardcover: 241 pages
Publisher: WND Books (July 4, 2007)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0979045142
ISBN-13: 978-0979045141
Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.1 x 0.8 inches

Editorial Reviews

Book Description
In the New York Times bestseller The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada, Jerome Corsi proves that the benignly-named "Security and Prosperity Partnership," created at a meeting between George W. Bush, Stephen Harper and Vincente Fox, is in fact the same kind of regional integration plan that led Europe to form the EU. According to Corsi, the elites in Europe who wanted to create a European nation knew that "it would be necessary to conceal from the peoples of Europe just what was being done in their name until the process was so far advanced that it had become irreversible." Could the same thing be happening here? Is American sovereignty doomed? Using dozens of documents secured through the Freedom of Information Act and his trademark hard-hitting interviews, Jerome Corsi sets out a chilling view of America's possible "harmonized" future -- one being created covertly, without voter input or Congressional oversight. Could our government's unfathomable position on illegal immigration be tied to the prospect of an integrated North American Union?

From the Publisher
Jerome Corsi received his Ph.D in political science from Harvard and is an expert on political violence and the U.S. anti-war movement. He's written many books, including co-authoring the #1 New York Times best-seller Unfit for Command. His most recent book is Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders.

About the Author
Jerome Corsi received his Ph.D in political science from Harvard and is an expert on political violence and the U.S. anti-war movement. He's written many books, including co-authoring the #1 New York Times best-seller Unfit for Command. His most recent book is Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders.

Purchase book: Buy here

What is the NAU: North American Union?

Detailed Analysis of the North American Union (Jump)

North American Union Overview
Established in March 2005, the "Security & Prosperity Partnership of North America" (SPP) is "integrating" core aspects of the United States, Canada and Mexico into a European Union (EU) style political, economic and strategic entity.This "Fully" developed "Union" includes an "Economic Union", a "Currency Union" and a "Political Union" in essence making a regional "super-nation" whereas the individual nations are subordinate to the larger "Union" body.

The SPP Agenda is integrating the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a Common Economic Community or "Economic Union" where the "FREE" movement of people and labor within the "North America Community" ("the region"), will result in corporations within the North America Community becoming more competitive while reducing the standard of living for most U.S. citizens while wages within the region equalize across the three nations. Refer to the formation of the "North American Competitiveness Council" (NACC ), which is comprised of major U.S., Canadian and Mexican corporations directing significant aspects of the SPP Agenda.

The "Comprehensive Immigration Plan" proposed by President Bush is part of the SPP Agenda.. Refer to the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007" (S.9). To lookup legislation go to: www.thomas.gov . Core aspects of this integration under the SPP include commerce, financial, regulatory and security (including military) elements of our three nations. To review the current progress click HERE. A "Currency Union" has been discussed and proposed. This would result in a common currency used throughout the region similar to Euro used within the EU. Many refer to this new currency as the "Amero"

This integration is REAL and the final phases of implementation are "On-track" for a 2007 phased roll-out. Significant aspects under the SPP Agenda have already been implemented!!Some call this a "Conspiracy Theory" - in truth they are RIGHT!!!

This "Conspiracy" is transpiring between top U.S., Canadian and Mexican officials, the U.S. Departments
of Commerce and Homeland Security and the Media who are keeping these plans out of the public spotlight!

If you care about our national sovereignty, our cherished American freedoms, the United States Constitution, American independence, retaining the American standard of living, and other unique values and features that adhere to the American
way of life - then you should support ALL efforts to STOP the North American Union!
If you are concerned about our "Open" borders policies then you should understand the SPP Agenda and how enforcing our current immigration laws are contrary to these policies.
If you are concerned about U.S. manufacturing job losses under the policies of NAFTA then you should be concerned about how the implementation of the North American Union will devastate the middle and lower class wage earners here in the U.S. Under the SPP, the failures of NAFTA are not being used to repeal the policies but rather to expand them and increase
foreign aid to Mexico.

United Nations Agenda 21 Chapter 2.1
The path leading to the "Security & Prosperity Partnership of North America" and the eventual formation
of the North American Union has been in the works for many years.
The United Nations Agenda 21 Chapter 2.1 set in place the framework for the expansion of globalism and
a new global partnership.
"2.1. In order to meet the challenges of environment and development, States have decided to establish
a new global partnership. This partnership commits all States to engage in a continuous and constructive dialogue, inspired by the need to achieve a more efficient and equitable world economy, keeping in view
the increasing interdependence of the community of nations and that sustainable development should become a priority item on the agenda of the international community." - review <here>

Partnership for Prosperity (P4P)
The "Security" portion of the "Security & Prosperity Partnership of North America" did not initially include "Security" part of the agenda. The events of September 11th, 2001 resulted in "Security" becoming a key component of the "Partnership".
President George W. Bush began to persue of his vision to creating a Western Hemisphere Free Trade zone shortly after taking office in 2001. This idea was advanced when President Bush convieded his three-day State Visit with Mexican President Vicente Fox September 6th, 2001.
The events of September 11th, 2001 provided both a distraction and opportunity to for the advancement of Presidents Bush's plan to create a Western Hemisphere Free-Trade Zone.
President Bush: "Democratic values cannot flourish unless our hemisphere builds a prosperity whose benefits are widely shared."

The European Union as a Template for the North American Union
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) serves as the intellectual incubator for most of the foreign policy direction followed by the executive branch of the federal government. Before the trilateral meeting between the heads of state in Waco on March 23 of last year, the CFR had already undertaken an initiative with its counterparts in Mexico and Canada (Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives) to study the possibility of integrating the three nations. Laying the foundation for the Waco meeting, the CFR produced a document entitled Creating a North American Community: Chairmen's Statement Independent Task Force on the Future of North America. The document called for "the creation by 2010 of a community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity for all North Americans."

The CFR is proposing nothing less than a plan to create a North American Union, similar to the European Union. The CFR protests that this is not its intention. "A new North American community" will not be modeled on the European Union or the European Commission, nor will it aim at the creation of any sort of vast supranational bureaucracy," the Chairmen's Statement said. In truth if one takes the time to read Robert A, Pastor's book, "Towards a North American Community" it is clear that many lessons were learned from the evolution of the E.U. and these learning's would be applied to the effort creating the North American Community.

NAFTA towards "Regional Integration"
North American integration got its big start with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The arrangement was billed as little more than the creation of a free trade arrangement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. But it really was the initial step toward regional integration. According to professor Guy Poitras of San Antonio's Trinity University, one of the factors motivating the creation of NAFTA was the view that it was an important early step toward further integration. In his book Inventing North America, Poitras noted that NAFTA's creation of regionalized interdependence gave "a structural foundation for the task of inventing North America."

In a pro-NAFTA article in the Washington Post in 1993, William Orme, Jr. pointed out that the then
fledgling trade pact was indeed a steppingstone to further integration. "NAFTA," Orme admitted, "lays the foundation for a continental common market, as many of its architects privately acknowledge. Part of this foundation, inevitably, is bureaucratic: The agreement creates a variety of continental institutions -
ranging from trade dispute panels to labor and environmental commissions - that are, in aggregate, an embryonic NAFTA government."

That free trade agreements like NAFTA must evolve into political unions is taken for granted among academics that work closely with such issues. In 1998, Glen Atkinson, professor of economics at the University of Nevada in Reno, described this step-by-step process in an article entitled "Regional
Integration in the Emerging Global Economy" in the Social Science Journal. Integration "must be an evolutionary process of continuous institutional development," Atkinson wrote. Indeed, the development of supranational governing organs is inevitable, though it will erode national sovereignty, he writes. "The need for shared institutions among the parties is critical for integration, which will lead to a weakening of
national sovereignty in some areas of interest. Sovereignty, however, must reside someplace in order to enforce regional working conditions, intellectual and other property rights and other concerns." NAFTA, being a "free trade" arrangement, is only a preliminary step. According to Atkinson:

The lowest level of integration is a free trade area, which involves only the removal of tariffs and quotas among the parties. If a common external tariff is added, then a customs union has been created. The next level, or a common market, requires free movement of people and capital as well as goods and services. It is this stage where institutional development becomes critical. The stage
of economic union requires a high degree of coordination or even unification of policies. This sets
the foundation for political union.

Now, according to those most concerned with creating a North American Union, it's time to move beyond NAFTA. Professor Robert Pastor of American University serves also as vice-chair of the CFR Task Force
on North America and is one of the primary intellectual architects of North American regionalism.
According to Pastor, even after NAFTA, U.S. policy has been too nationalistic. "Instead of trying to fashion a North American approach to continental problems, we continue to pursue problems on a dual-bilateral basis, taking one issue at a time," Pastor said in testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere on June 9, 2005. "But incremental steps will no longer solve
the security problem, or allow us to grasp economic opportunities. What we need to do now is forge a North American Community," Pastor stated

This, in fact, has been a major goal of the Bush administration and of the Mexican administration of
Vicente Fox. In a paper entitled Closing the Development Gap: A Proposal for a North American
Investment Fund, Pastor and coauthors Samuel Morley and Sherman Robinson point out that Mexican President Vicente Fox has long advocated a North American common market. "Soon after he won
Mexico's presidential election on July 2, 2000, Vicente Fox proposed a Common Market to replace the
free-trade area," Pastor, Morley, and Robinson wrote. "He invited President George W. Bush to his home
in February 2001 and persuaded him to endorse 'The Guanajuato Proposal.'" President Bush quickly
signed on to the plan. In a joint statement with Fox released by the White House on February 16, 2001, Bush described the outcome of the meeting. "After consultation with our Canadian partners, we will strive
to consolidate a North American economic community whose benefits reach the lesser-developed areas
of the region and extend to the most vulnerable social groups in our countries," said the Bush/Fox statement announcing a new "partnership for prosperity."A Deepening Union
With the announcement on March 23, 2005 of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the Bush administration, along with the governments of Mexico and Canada, has taken the next step toward a European Union-style superstate in North America. The SPP features a wide range of initiatives on matters related to security and commerce. These include:

Create a proto-parliament called the North AmericanCompetitiveness Council. According to official SPP documents, this body will "address issues of immediate importance" and provide "strategic" advice. It will also "provide input on the compatibility of our security and prosperity agendas."

Under the purported threat of an avian flu pandemic, the parties to the SPP will harmonize plans for continuity of government in the event of a crisis. Refer to these recent comments by Robert A. Pastor regard a "Crisis" to bring about a merger .

Begin harmonizing security organs by creating a "common approach to critical infrastructure protection," and "develop and implement joint plans for cooperation for incident response, as well as conduct coordinated training and exercises in emergency response."

Create a single energy policy for North America by "improving transparency and regulatory compatibility."

The SPP also has tremendous implications for immigration. As NAFTA erased most remaining barriers hampering the flow of capital between Canada, Mexico, and the United States, the SPP will look for ways
to eliminate bottlenecks hampering the flow of people. According to the official SPP agenda, the new international body will work to "identify measures to facilitate further the movement of business persons."

Specific policies likely to be followed by the SPP can be found in the CFR report entitled Building a North American Community that was released just after the March 23, 2005 SPP meeting in Waco, Texas. In its recommendations, the CFR report suggests, "The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments' physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America." This goes a long way toward explaining the maddening lack of urgency that is apparent in Washington concerning the issue of illegal immigration from Mexico. If the SPP follows the CFR template - a virtual certainty - there will no longer be a border to cross illegally.

Moving Fast
Perhaps the most important difference between the formation of the European Union and the effort to build
a North American Union is the speed at which the North American version is moving ahead. In Europe, union took decades, with efforts starting just after World War II and culminating in the 1990s. In North America, issues related to union first began only in 1965. According to economist Glen Atkinson, "NAFTA has evolved over several stages beginning with the Canadian-U.S. automobile pact of 1965 and the Canadian-U.S. Free Trade Agreement of 1989." Now, little more than a decade after NAFTA comes the SPP.

A measure of the rapidity with which this drive for a NorthAmerican Union can affect the lives of citizens is the planned super highway linking the U.S.'s northern and southern borders. The plan for this highway is breathtaking. It includes plans to start construction in 2007 on the so-called Trans Texas Corridor, to be built in large part by a Spanish construction company.

According to the magazine International Construction Review,the project "would be part of the 'super-highway' spanning the United States from the Mexican border at Laredo, making its way through Texas, Kansas and Oklahoma and connecting with the Canadian highway system north of Duluth, Minnesota. Because it would provide a connection all the way between Canada and Mexico, the project is also described as the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) super highway."A further measure of the speed with which a North AmericanUnion is likely to develop is found within the CFR's recommendations for the SPP. That organization, which so often drafts the foreign-policy blueprints followed by the federal government, calls for "the creation by 2010 of a North American community.... Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America."It is incredible, but just three years from now - if the CFR template continues to be followed - the United States may cease to exist as an independent political entity. Its laws, rules, and regulations - including all freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution - will be subject to review and nullification by the North American Union's governing body. Sure, the United States will still be here in name - American soldiers will still fight, mostly, under the U.S. flag. There will be a U.S. president and both houses of Congress will continue to meet and pass legislation. Nevertheless, in very important ways, the United States will
become nothing more than a province - albeit an important one - in the emergent North American superstate.

Please view these sites for a much more detailed account of the North American Union/SPP
http://www.stopthenau.org (*excerpts above from this site.)
http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/NAU/
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com

See Videos:
NAU/SPP Videos